We reported last week on the government’s crackdown on a minority of umbrella companies operating Employment Benefit Trust Schemes (EBTS), which it has instructed HMRC to classify as disguised remuneration and prosecute accordingly. However, the clampdown has attracted criticism from the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT), which has dubbed the Government’s approach to the issue as a “blunt instrument.”
Urging further reflection before final legislation is introduced, CIOT’s Colin Ben-Nathan, who chairs the organisation’s Employment Taxes Sub-Committee, expressed his disappointment that the coalition had so far not heeded calls to reconsider its approach. Criticising the current plans for taxing the form (i.e., the involvement of a third party) rather than the substance of the arrangement (the specific kind of loan or reward connected with employment), he said that presently, the proposals were “a very blunt instrument” which would hit employers and employees in unintended ways.
As things stand, the legislation will require meticulous reading by contractors, HMRC and employers alike to determine whether new PAYE/NIC triggers will be activated. This will prove costly and time consuming, affecting smaller owner-managed firms or family businesses especially badly, Mr Ben-Nathan added. Many businesses, he predicted, would need to approach HMRC “to determine whether or not their current arrangements are affected.”
CIOT is concerned that the proposed legislation leaves too much discretion to HMRC to decide which arrangements fall on the right side of the line. This will inevitably lead to uncertainty, Mr Ben-Nathan argues, with the position changing according to shifts in HMRC’s view.